Tag Archives: Ministry of Environment

Ken Betwa Link Project gets environment clearance

Newsroom24x7 Desk

Only a small part of Panna Tiger Reserve would come under submrgence
Only a small part of Panna Tiger Reserve would come under submrgence

NEW DELHI: The Union Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change has accorded the crucial Environment clearance for the ambitious Ken-Betwa river link project spread over two States -Madhya Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh.

The public announcement was made today about the environment clearance for the Ken-Betwa river linking project. The Environment Appraisal Committee had met and approved the river linking project-the first in the country-on December 30, 2016. The Ministry of Tribal Affairs also approved the tribal clearance of the project on 2 January 2017.

The environment clearance was granted after a detailed presentation on forest and wildlife issues was made at the December 30 meeting of the Environment Appraisal Committee.

According to the minutes of the Environment Appraisal Committee meeting held on 30 December, 2016, it was noted at this meeting that the project envisages construction of 77 m high and 2,031 m long composite dam across Ken river near village Daudhan in Chhatarpur District of Madhya Pradesh to provide irrigation facility to 6.35 lakh ha area of land, drinking water facility and generation of 78 MW hydropower. Two (2) powerhouses, viz., (i) 2 units of 30 MW capacity each, and (ii) 3 units of 6 MW capacity each are proposed to be constructed. Two (2) tunnels of 1.9 km long upper level and 1.1 km long lower level tunnel and 221 km long Ken-Betwa link Canal Phase-I on the left bank of the river are proposed to constructed. It is proposed to provide irrigation facility in 6,35,661 ha of area in Panna, Chhatarpur, Tikamgarh District of Madhya Pradesh and Banda, Mahoba and Jhansi Districts in Uttar Pradesh. Total submergence area is 9,000 ha, out of which 5,258 ha is forestland (it includes 4,141 ha in Panna Tiger Reserve). A total of 10 villages consisting of 1,585 families are likely to be affected by this project. Panna Tiger Reserve falls within the 10 km radius of the project. The total cost of the project is about Rs.9,393 Crores and it is likely to be completed in 9 years.

The project was earlier considered by the EAC in its meetings held on 24- 25th August, 2015, 26-27th October, 2015 and 8-9th February, 2016.
The EAC noted that the e-flows have been calculated on the basis of approved monthly flow series for the 75% dependable year (1988-89). Ken River is a non-perennial river and the 75% dependable year i.e. monsoon season (June-September) run-off is 6541.56 MCM. The average non-monsoon/non-lean season (October-January) run-off is 9.11 MCM, whereas there is negligible run off during the lean season from February to May. Out of the total run off at Daudhan dam site, 2,266 MCM of water is earmarked for proposed upstream utilization and the monthly distribution on pro-rata basis. The e-flow are presented below:

The committee was informed that while considering the project by EAC in its meeting held on 24-25th August, 2015, the EAC had noted that the Panna Tiger Reserve was being affected very significantly and that all aspects of this project in relation to this disturbance to the reserve need to be studied and assessed more carefully. EAC had also noted that the Landscape Management Plan (LSMP) is being prepared by WII for the mitigation measures to be taken up in the Panna Tiger Reserve/ Ghariyal Sanctuary. Since, many of the members of the EAC are from expert organizations, which are responsible for the preparation of the LSMP there could be some conflict of interest. In fact one of the members had sought opinion on this and he was advised to recluse himself when this project is discussed. Under the circumstances it will be appropriate that a second opinion from a non-government expert is obtained. EAC should dwell on this in the next meeting and select the external expert for the purpose.

The PP submitted the additional information based on queries raised in the EAC meeting held during August, 2015 and the same was reconsidered by EAC, in its meeting held on 26-27th October, 2015. The PP informed that the State Wildlife Board (SWLB), Government of Madhya Pradesh, has decided to recommend the proposal to NBWL for wildlife clearance. The matter of preparation of Landscape
Management Plan (LMP) by WII, Dehradun and its implementation & monitoring has been considered by State Wildlife Board (SWLB), Government of Madhya Pradesh on 22.9.2015 and also approved by NTCA of MoEF&CC. EAC noted that the above landscape plan is being prepared by WII, Dehradun. Therefore, in the absence of such plan, the committee cannot examine the proposal in totality.
The EAC had mentioned that after completion of the plan, and obtaining a second opinion on the LMP from an external expert, the project will be reviewed and will be reconsidered again for appraisal for grant of Environmental Clearance. The PP submitted additional information again based on the EAC meeting held in October, 2015 and the same was reconsidered by EAC in its meeting held on 8-9th February, 2016. Apart from the reply on few queries, the details on LMP could not be submitted and the Committee once again asked the PP to submit the LMP.

The project proponent submitted compliance report and additional information and the same was again reconsidered by EAC, in its meeting held on 2-3rd June, 2016. The project was discussed in detailed and issues raised in earlier meetings were clarified by the project proponent. It was also informed that the Environmental Management Plan (EMP) has been prepared and predicted impact on actual requirement and incorporating suggestions of people, etc. therein. The detailed budget estimated in the EMP are presented below:


The project proponent also informed that the WII, Dehradun has sought minimum 3-year time for formulation of the Landscape Management Plan for the Panna Tiger Reserve which will be affected by the project. The EAC mentioned that the matter be expedited to 3-4 months for completion of LMP and after finalizing LMP, the same will be appraised by the EAC for EC.

The project proponent submitted the compliance report and the same has been considered by the newly reconstituted EAC in its meeting held on 30.12.2016. The project proponent made a detailed presentation. NTCA has made a detailed presentation on Landscape Management Plan. In the presentation, it was mentioned that the LMP shall be an exhaustive document to be prepared considering various factors and it cannot be completed in a shorter period of time.

It was also mentioned that while preparing LMP, monitoring is to be carried-out at the pre-project stage, during construction phase and post-construction phase. The LMP mainly envisages the accommodation of the movement of tigers from the PTR to nearby forest conservation areas/wildlife sanctuaries. It would also consider upgradation of these conservation areas/wildlife sanctuaries to Tiger Reserves. Therefore, the LMP issue is to be delinked from the issue of EC for the Ken-Betwa Link Project Phase-I as it is a long-term management plan for Tiger conservation in the PTR area.

The new EAC was also informed that it was decided in the 2-3rd June, 2016 of EAC meeting that a meeting be convened by NWDA among Shri H.S. Kingra, Vice Chairman of the then EAC, MoEF&CC officials with Director, WII, Dehradun for expediting the finalization of the LMP within 3-4 months instead of 3 years. It was intimated by NWDA that the said meeting could not be convened due to paucity of time among the above officials and subsequently, the tenure of EAC ended on 03.09.2016. As the EAC couldn’t be re-constituted immediately after validity period, the Competent Authority in the MoEF&CC approved to convene the aforesaid meeting which was convened on 30.11.2016. In the said meeting, Dr.
H.S. Negi, IG (Forest), NTCA, Dr. S. Kerketta, Director (River Valley), MoEF&CC, Dr. K. Ramesh, Scientist ‘D’, WII, Dehradun and Officials from NWDA attended. WII gave a detailed presentation on the preparation of LMP. A consensus was arrived among the officials present in the meeting and it was decided that i) NTCA to give a brief presentation before the EAC in its next immediate meeting to appraise the preparation of LMP and ii) As the scope of the LMP was different and covers beyond the study area of EIA/EMP report of Ken-Betwa Inter-Linking Project, it should be
delinked from the perspective of the Environmental Clearance.
The NWDA further informed that the Standing Committee of National Wildlife Board in its 39th meeting held on 23.8.2016 has recommended the project for clearance. The Ministry issued wildlife clearance for Ken-Betwa Project in Madhya Pradesh on 21.9.2016 with the following conditions:

i. the conditions prescribed by site inspection team and NCTA, as agreed by MoWR and that the resultant reservoir area shall be retained as core area with minimum activities for management purpose under close consultation with the Tiger Reserve Management. The landscape based plan for the area will be finalized with NCTA in lead, assisted by WII, State Forest department and project proponents.

ii. the effort to integrate the said 3 wildlife sanctuaries within the PTR will be undertaken simultaneously and the management objective of these areas will be in context of treatment of the area as a part of tiger landscape.

Requirement of all extant statues related to environment and forest including EC and FC shall be met as applicable. After detailed deliberation, discussion and considering all the relevant facts of the project as presented by NWDA, the EAC noted that the scope of the LMP is quite large. There is a wide perspective in regards to the implementation of LMP beyond the affected areas of the proposed project. Hence, EAC agreed to delink the same from this proposed project for EC purposes and recommended the project for grant of EC with the following conditions:

i. As the submergence area is very large (about 9,000 ha), micro-climatic change conditions in the project area during construction/post construction period to be brought-out/reported at regular intervals.
ii. Impact due to habitat change having effect like corridor and loss of migratory path for wildlife including birds and impact on the breeding
ground of species should be recorded during pre-construction/post-construction stages.
iii. Plans for greenbelt development and reservoir rim treatment plan have to be made in consultation with State Forest Department. Preference shall also be given to plant local indigenous species. If possible, transplantation of trees from the submergence area of the project be taken up and these may be re-planted in the affected area of the project as a part of LMP.
iv. The PTR is facing acute shortage of water and due to creation of reservoir, the water regime will improve to a great extent. The extent of creation of pasture land due to receding of submergence, increase of herbivorous population, growth in vulture population as well as increase in Tiger population be recorded in the project area.
v. While implementing the LMP for PTR, EAC suggested that as and when the Land Management Plan, etc. are taken up in the affected areas of the KenBetwa Link Project Phase-I, status of implementation of the same shall be submitted to the Ministry and Regional Office, MoEF&CC, Bhopal for its monitoring on six monthly basis.
vi. All conditions stipulated in the NBWL clearance should also be included in EC letter.
vii. Solid waste generated, especially plastic waste, should not be disposed of as landfill material. It should be treated with scientific approach and recycled.
viii. An e-mail was received by the Chairman and the Members of EAC, drawing attention to a notification dated Oct. 2016 from MOWR, RD&GR that prohibits any construction within the larger Ganga basin rivers. When clarification was sought from NWDA, it was informed that this notification applies to only those constructions that cause pollution because otherwise,
it may mean that even a bridge cannot be constructed across any river in the Ganga basin. After deliberating over the matter, the EAC directed the Member – Secretary to clarify this point with the Director General, NMCG, MOWR, RD&GR before taking approval of the competent authority for issue of EC.
ix. Six monthly compliance reports shall be submitted to Regional Office, MoEF & CC, Bhopal without fail until completion of the modernization works.

Click here for backgrunder, and more news

No final decision on GM Mustard as yet says Government of India

Newsroom24x7 Staff

GM MustardNew Delhi:  Government of India has described as inaccurate reports in a section of the media stating that the statutory Genetic Engineering Appraisal Committee (GEAC), under the Union Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, has granted approval to GM Mustard.

In a statement today the Government has clarified that no final decision has been taken as yet on the issue. The GEAC, in a meeting held on August 11, 2016, examined the Safety Document prepared by the Sub-Committee of the GEAC. The GEAC has appraised the Safety Document prepared by the Sub-Committee and the Safety Document will be put up on the website of GEAC inviting comments from the public.

Selection of NBA Chairman: The exercise to fill the post remains under a cloud

Newsroom24x7 Exclusive

The absence of a dedicated Head at National Biodiversity Authority (NBA) speaks volumes of the thrust, focus and priority that is being given to the field of biodiversity conservation by Government of India.

NBANew Delhi: The National Biodiversity Authority (NBA) remains headless for the last one-and-half year as the top seat remains conspicuously unoccupied. In the absence of a full-time Chairman, the affairs of NBA are being looked after by Hem Pande, a 1982 batch Indian Administrative Services (IAS) officer and Additional Secretary, Minister of Environment, Forest and Climate Change. His working headquarter is in Delhi and he has also been given the additional charge of acting Chairman at NBA, which in itself is a full time separate job.

The absence of a dedicated Head at NBA speaks volumes of the thrust, focus and priority that is being given to the field of biodiversity conservation by Government of India.

It is mandatory requirement that the chairman of NBA should have adequate knowledge and experience of biodiversity conservation, sustainable use of bio-resources and equitable sharing of benefits arising out of the use of bio resources as per Section 8 of Biological Diversity Act (BDA).

National Biodiversity Authority is the premier authority in India for biodiversity conservation.

Two Successive advertisements or the call for applications to fill the post of Chairman NBA have given weightage to the mandatory requirement vis-a-vis experience in terms of benefit sharing and sustainable use of bio resources. But at the same time there is also the provision for relaxing the qualification. This sounds contrary to the law of the land and can be declared null and void if challenged in court.

Apparently there is a conspiracy to accommodate a bureaucrat (a retiring government of India Secretary) when the process to fill the post of chairman of NBA is initiated. This has happened for the second time in a row. This is explicit from the fact that the call for applications to fill the NBA chief’s post mentioned that the candidate should be well versed with current developments related to access and benefit sharing under various relevant international fora. Candidates were also supposed to have experience of working with different stakeholders in biodiversity and experience in participation in international negotiations. Obviously only officers at Secretary or Additional Secretary level in Government of India have the experience of participating in international negotiations.

After the recruitment process was abandoned last year at the intervention from the Prime Minister’s office (PMO) after on the grounds of conflict of interest as the then retiring Secretary of Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEF) was himself in the race for the NBA chairman’s post.

This time, the name of a chief secretary who is just about to retire is in the panel forwarded to the PMO by the MoEF for the top NBA post. He does not meet the mandatory educational requirement. He is a BE and has a PG diploma whereas a Post Graduate degree is an essential prerequisite for this post.

It is learnt that the selection process is being delayed to coincide with the superannuation of “the Chief Secretary” this July end.

(An investigative report by newsroom24x7.com)

BMS Rathore goes as Chief Policy Adviser ICIMOD

Newsroom24x7 Desk

BMS Rathore
BMS Rathore

New Delhi: Indian Forest Service officer (1982), borne on the Madhya Pradesh cadre, BMS Rathore has been appointed as Chief policy Adviser in International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD) in Kathmandu, the capital of Nepal.

For Rathore, who as Joint Secretary in the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change at the Centre, has been closely associated with policy making, it would be a 3-year tenure as Chief Policy Adviser ICIMOD.

The Appointments Committee of the Cabinet (ACC), earlier this week, approved the proposal of the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change for granting cadre clearance to Rathore to take up the foreign assignment under all-India Service rules (AIS Rules-1954) in relaxation of the ‘cooling off’ period.

Rathore has been the Member Secretary of the Madhya Pradesh Biodiversity Board where he was engaged with multi-stakeholder processes for conservation, sustainable use and equitable sharing of benefits arising out of use of biodiversity and associated knowledge. Prior to this, he was the Forest Conservator of Seoni Forest Circle and a trainer at the Wildlife Institute of India. He is recipient of national award “Indira Priyadarshini Vriksh Mitra Award”, for excellence in community based forest management.

He was responsible for the design and implementation of training programs in integrated conservation and development for protected area managers, field staff, NGOs and local communities. He has more than a decade of experience as a field forester and has initiated and developed strategies for joint management of forests by government and local communities.