Exclusion of some experts puts a question mark on the reconstituted MP State Wildlife Board

Newsroom24x7 Network

Eyebrows are being raised and questions asked regarding the factors responsible for the last moment exclusion of some conservationists and wildlife experts who were officially informed about a month ago that they were being “nominated” by the Madhya Pradesh Forest department for the State Wildlife Board proposed to be reconstituted by the Madhya Pradesh Government.

Ultimately, after dragging the process of reconstituting the State Wildlife Board for a couple of months, the Madhya Pradesh Government on Saturday, 3 August 2019, issued the gazette notification about the reconstituted State Wildlife Board.

The Additional Secretary Madhya Pradesh Forest department, through a letter (no. f/15-5/2006/10-2 dated 27 April 2019), had carried forward the process of constituting the State Wildlife Board in the last week of April this year.

On 8 July, the State Chief Wildlife Warden and Principal Chief Conservator of Forest (Wildlife) Dr. U Prakasham had sent by email and also got delivered the hard copy of a letter, addressed jointly to nine persons informing them that the Madhya Pradesh State Wildlife Board is proposed to be reconstituted. “While nominating you as a member in this, a signed copy of your complete bio-data (curriculum vitae) is required”, the letter said and carried the instruction that the biodata be sent immediately by email to pccfwl@mp.gov.in so that it could be forwarded to the Government.

The letter of 8 July 2019 was addressed to the following persons:

1. Dr M K Ranjitsinh, Wildlife Trust of India
2. Dharmendra Shukla, Retired Principal Chief Conservator of Forest, Madhya Pradesh
3. Dr. Suhas Kumar, Retired Principal Chief Conservator of Forest, Madhya Pradesh
4. Dr. Surendra Tiwari, Director/partner Dainik Nai Dunia
5. Khageshwar Nayak, retired IFS
6. Ganesh Pandey, Senior Journalist
7. Lalit Shastri, Senior Journalist
8. Ajay Shankar Dubey
9. Dr Raka Arya, Associate Professor, National Law Institute University

Reconstituted Wildlife Board

The State Chief Minister is the Chairman and the State Forest Minister is the Vice Chairman of the reconstituted State Wildlife Board.

Nominated at the top of the list in this high powered body under the Environmentalist/Expert in the field of Conservation category is senior journalist Rashid Kidwai.  He has been recognised for “special interest in wildlife” as per the gazette notification.

According to Wikipedia, Rasheed Kidwai is a writer and journalist. He is the author of the book, Sonia, A Biography. He also wrote a book based on Congress Party headquarters; 24, Akbar Road.
For Kidwai’s introduction: Click the Observer Research Foundation page.

Others inducted as member in the newly constituted Wildlife Board under the Environmentalist/Expert in the field of Conservation category are:

1. Valmik Thapar, Wildlife expert, New Delhi
2. Krishna Kumar Singh, special interest in wildlife, Gadhi Semria, district Sidhi,
3. Dr. B.M.S. Rathod, Retired Principal Chief Conservator of Forest
4. Dr. Suhas Kumar, Retired Principal Chief Conservator of Forest
5. Brijendra Singh, special interest in wildlife, New Delhi
6. Khageshwar Nayak, Retired Indian Forest Service
7. The senior-most Field Director of National Park

The ex-officio members of the reconstituted Board are:

  1. Chief Secretary, Madhya Pradesh
  2. Additional Chief Secretary/Principal Secretary -State Forest Department and State Scheduled Tribe Welfare department
  3. Principal Chief Conservator of Forest and head of the State Forest department
  4. Managing Director, Madhya Pradesh Tourism Development Corporation
  5. Additional Director General of Police and Chairman Madhya Pradesh Tiger Cell
  6. A representative of the Army, not less than the rank of Brigadier (to be nominated by the Government of India)
  7. Director, State Veterinary Department
  8. Director , Department of Fisheries
    Director Wildlife, Government of India or his/her representative
  9. Representative of Director Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun
    Representative of Botanical Survey of India
  10. Representative of Zoological Survey of India
  11. Principal Chief Conservator of Wildlife and Chief Wildllife Warden of MP (ex-officio Member Secretary)

MLAs nominated to the Board are:

  1. Lakshman Singh, MLA Chachouda, district Guna, MP
  2. Sanjay Uike, MLA Baihar, district Blaghat, MP
  3. Phundelal Singh Marko, MLA Pushrajgarh, district Anuppur, MP

Non-Government organisations connected with wildlife included as Members

  1. Representative of World Wide Fund for Nature
  2. Representative of Bombay Natural History Society, and
  3. Wildlife Trust of India

In the reconstituted body, those who have been dropped from among those who had been informed by the Government in the first fortnight of July this year that they were being “nominated” to the Wildlife Board are:

Dharmendra Shukla, Dr. Surendra Tiwari, Ganesh Pandey, Lalit Shastri, and Dr Raka Arya.

In place of Dr M K Ranjitsinh, whose name was there in the original list, his organisation – Wildlife Trust of India – has been nominated as member.

Ajay Shankar Dubey is another person who also figured in this list. According to an earlier newspaper report, he had expressed his unwillingness to join this body.

Under the Wildlife (Protection) Act,1972, the mandate of the Wildlife Advisory Board is to advise the State Government in the selection of areas to be declared as sanctuaries, National Parks and closed areas and the administration thereof; in formulation of the policy for protection and conservation of the wild life and specified plants; in any matter relating to the amendment of any Schedule; in relation to the measures to be taken for harmonizing the needs of the tribals and other dwellers of the forest with the protection and conservation of wild life; and in any other matter connected with the protection of wild life which may be referred to it by the State Government.


  1. It’s a shameless case of overruling a valid nomination to patronise a rank outsider without any track record in the field of wildlife conservation


  2. I find that in the journalist conservationist category, the state govt has selected a person with no credentials and ignored somebody like Lalit Shastri. Speaks volumes of the state govts real interests in conservation


  3. On reading the news item in detail and clicking the links provided, I find that renowned conservationist and a very senior journalist, who has served Madhya Pradesh for the cause of environment, ecology and wildlife through his not-for-profit CREW and the columns of The Hindu, The Asian Age and through the widely read news portal newsroom24x7.com was dropped, obviously at the final stage of reconstituting the Wildlife Board. On the other hand, another journalist whose bio data doesn’t reflect any experience in the conservation sphere but is known more for a book he wrote on Sonia Gandhi, has been brought onboard by the State Congress Government. Question arises is the state government bent upon reducing the wildlife board into a platform for joyrides?


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.