Overburdened Judiciary: CJI’s plight, PM’s assurance and the ground reality

Lalit Shastri

 Prime Minister Narendra Modi at the inauguration of the Joint Conference of CMs & Chief Justices of HCs, in New Delhi on April 24, 2016. The Union Minister for Law & Justice, D.V. Sadananda Gowda and the Chief Justice of India Justice T.S. Thakur are also seen.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi at the inauguration of the Joint Conference of CMs & Chief Justices of HCs, in New Delhi on April 24, 2016. The Union Minister for Law & Justice, D.V. Sadananda Gowda and the Chief Justice of India Justice T.S. Thakur are also seen.

Chief Justice of India TS Thakur was emotionally surcharged on Sunday when in a choked voice he raised the issue of the large number of cases pending in various courts and pointed out that the judiciary continues to be overburdened.

The CJI was addressing a Joint Conference of Chief Ministers and Chief Justices of the High Courts on Sunday in front of Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

The CJI said it will not be proper to put all the blame on the judiciary since it was the responsibility of the executive to bring about judicial reforms. The reforms are essential not only for the undertrial prisoners languishing in jails but also for the sake of development and progress of the country, is what the CJI chose to convey on this occasion.

Referring to the speech of the Chief Justice of India, the Prime Minister said that he understood the Chief Justice’s concern. He went on to express the hope that the Government and the Judiciary could work together to find solutions to these issues.

The Prime Minister also stressed on the efforts being made by the Government to remove archaic laws from the statute books.

Judiciary2The problem of an overburdened judiciary underscored by the CJI today was also highlighted by me on my social networking site two years ago. I wrote:

If we can afford a massive uniformed and disciplined force to defend our borders why can’t the nation support the judiciary and a system of subordinate courts with adequate resources and manpower to protect people’s right to speedy, fair, corruption-free and an affordable legal system. The huge backlog of cases and the much accepted system of judges holding a final verdict by marking so many cases as ‘reserved for order’ at the end of long drawn hearings or just advancing dates to suit the advocates’ convenience is a travesty of circumstances for those caught in legal wrangles.

A review of the situation regarding judiciary and pending cases after the related issues have been acknowledged and brought in the public domain both by the Prime Minister and the Chief Justice of India by Newsroom24x7 shows that a lot of ground will have to be covered to bring about any perceptible difference in the situation when it comes to the disposal of pending cases.

Till the end of September 2015, against a sanctioned strength of 31, there were three vacancies (of judges) in Supreme Court.

On 30 September 2015, 59910 cases were pending in the Supreme Court. Of these 26404 were regular matters and 33506 were admission matters. Of the total 59910 cases pending in the Apex Court, 48717 were Civil cases and 11193 were criminal cases.

Significantly 43376 cases were pending in Supreme Court for more than a year out of the 59910 pending cases on 30 September 2015. A closer look at these figures however shows that if connected matters were to be excluded, the pendency in real terms was 36414 matters on 30 Septemer 2015 and even this number is on a higher side at the Apex court level.

On June 30, 2015, the situation with regard to vacanices in High Courts was on the higher side. The Allahabd High Court was topping the list with 81 vacanceis followed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana with 31 vacancies and Karnataka 30 and Bombay 29.

In the High Courts across India, the pendency of cases (criminal +civil) at the end of Q2 2016 was 4005704. On the corresponding cut off date the pendency of cases in district and subordinate courts was 27156020. On June 30, 2015, the district and subordinate courts in India were having a total of 5074 vacancies against a sanctioned strength of 20495. States with the maximim vacancies were Bihar (730), Gujarat (717), Maharashtra (501), Rajasthan (369), Uttar Pradesh (323), Delhi (309), Karnataka (288), Madhya Pradesh 227, and Jharkhand (221).

On September 5, 2014, a three Judge Bench of the Supreme Court presided by the then Chief Justice of India R.M. Lodha had directed judicial officers across states in India to review the situation in their districts and ensure the release of undertrial prisoners who had been in detention for half the maximum period of imprisonment prescribes under law for the offence they were being tried in court. This order excluded those who were being tried for murder. The then CJI had especially drawn attention to the gravity of the problem by pointing out that 66 per cent of the prison inmates in the country were undertrial prisoners.

In 2014, a total of 13,95,121 undertrials were released, out of which 64,216 undertrails were acquitted.

Categories: India

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

2 replies

  1. great post, hopefully tears will result in some action.



  1. A case for addressing the defective system of justice | Newsroom24x7

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: